Daniel García Andújar Archive » 2009

Daniel G. Andújar, Lapses

admin — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:25:37 +0000

In front of the photograph of my mother as a child, I tell myself: she is going to die: I shudder,like Winnicott’s psychotic patient, over a catastrophe, which has already occurred.Whether or not the subject is already dead, every photograph is this catastrophe.
Roland Barthes

Başak Şenova*

Today, media collects and distributes images for us with immense speed and magnitude.We are surrounded by these images; and more than ever, all communication technologies -as efficient apparatuses of late capitalism- infuse our lives with vast attacks of images. Nevertheless, we have also learned from the same sources that the meaning of any image is dependent on the context. It is not only the images, but also ideologies and realities behind the images that are being created for us.In this respect, “Postcapital”, as an ironically questioning archive developed by Daniel G. Andújar, shoots back with the same gun by detecting lapses in our perceptionand explanation of political, cultural, economic, social, and even technological conditions and realities. He indexes our cognitive mechanisms. Andújar’s project strives to make sensible connections between mediated images ofan immense and chaotic pile. His intention is building a system that helps the viewer/user to correlate incidents of certain periods of different time slices of a decade via multidirectional links. The links are supposed to work like synapses between neurons: Firing back and forth, carrying information between each and every single image so as to build up consciousness on a neural network… The period between the years of 1989-2001, to which the images refer, is the period when the Internet ascended on the conventional and relatively much slower media. It can be regarded almost as the Big Bang of the media image production and circulation processes, aswell as the lapses caused by overloaded information.

*Başak Şenova, 2009 Venice Biennial Turkish Pavilion curator

Share:

Tags: 2009, Basak Senova, Postcapital, Venice Biennial Turkish Pavilion

Ways of Working. Iris Dressler vs Daniel G. Andújar

admin — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:07:22 +0000

Corversation

The Unavowable Community

Iris Dressler: In one of our recent conversations, you described how the machinery of the bigger art institutions alienates the artists from their work to a certain extent. You put it more or less in the following way: the artist, arriving at the museum to install his or her works, is sent to luxury hotels, restaurants and bars, while an armada of professionals—technicians, restorers, architects, designers, coordinators, assistants and so forth—care for the ‘proper’ presentation and communication of his of her work, following the standards of the respective institution. This is not to mention that at this moment the curator and the PR and education departments have long since defined—again in line with the conventions of the respective house—the ways of mediating the artist’s works. The artist, finally arriving at the ‘ready-to-go’ exhibition, might be shocked, as he or she no longer recognises his or her work the way it is embodied in and absorbed by the corporate setting. But it is too late: the press, board, VIPs and the like are already standing by. These attitudes and workflows of the institutional machinery are of course not a new phenomenon if you just remember the cartoon-like diagram Average Day at the Museum by the MoMA from the 1940s. But it seems that until now museums in particular are largely ignoring over 40 years of ongoing and quite diverse practices as well as discourses of institutional critique. They instead basically submit themselves far too voluntarily to almost phantasmal political pressures regarding the museum’s city marketing and tourist impact, fixating on irrational growth in visitor numbers and pulling in lucrative and glamorous private corporations. In my view, these politically indoctrinated ‘missions’ of the museum (which go hand in hand with corporate demands) have nothing to do—as is often claimed—with the financial needs of museum maintenance. They are solely about putting the museum on a prestigious stage for business and politics. By this logic, the artist seems to be a sort of alien, a disruptive factor that needs to be sedated to fit in with the museum’s rhetoric.

Daniel G. Andújar: Artistic practice, as I conceive it, must be transformed into a form of ‘resistance’ against a model obstinately aimed at prevailing in a space of relations that is becoming more and more confused, normalised, globalised, hierarchical, diffused, standardised and so on. Our society, economy and culture are founded upon interests, values, institutions, and systems of representation that, in general terms, limit creativity, confiscate and manipulate the artist’s work and divert his energy toward sterile confrontation and discouragement.

The practice of art must reveal the configurations of power, establish mechanisms of relating socially that ensure its long-term impact and extend its discourse beyond the restricted confines of art lovers, occasional tourists and of the institution itself. Those who direct the framework of cultural industries and the management of cultural institutions abandoned, decades ago, the processes of creating new content and cultural production as a collective construction. Most of the professionals who run this framework are simply developing a personal power structure, climbing up the ladder to the most visible and media-friendly part of the public and private art institutions. They flaunt their power and reign over the reality of their little empire. The art institution has been absorbed as just another mechanism in the process of servicing production. It is an active part of the ‘touristification’ process in the urban context and participates in the complex re-adaptation of the new city’s infrastructures. Artists have been pushed to the sidelines to make room for a new elite of cultural managers who work on biennial events in ivory towers conceived more like mausoleums.

The museum institution is undoubtedly facing a challenge with all its paradoxes and contradictions: existing as a physical space that promotes cultural initiatives which are increasingly part of a more diffuse representation where systems of representation and dissemination pass through intangible networks that, in turn, inevitably require a physical container, a real space to produce and deliver from.

Things will become increasingly difficult in the permanent and most likely also in the temporary and hybrid zones where people can meet, talk, work, even celebrate and dissolve as social groups, move and/or form new groups. The contradiction of a cultural process necessarily faces a slow pace of technological development and social frenzy.

In Spain, for example, where most art institutions have been in operation for less than a decade, we are living a misconception, a professionalisation effect that transforms the practice of art into a professional area, a kind of factory, with little connection to the artist’s procedures.

Because we have these ‘professionals’, our costs for production and installation are the most expensive in Europe, and we lack options for improvisation but have a very dangerous process of standardisation. Professionalisation here is a perilous process that transforms every employee in the museum into a true ‘professional of the highest integrity and competence’, excluding the artists from any decision about their own work.

The professionalisation process in museums tends to establish norms of conduct and qualifications for museum workers and also insists that they ‘conform to the norms of the museum’ and with the established procedures and code of conduct, enforced by the hierarchy, since ‘accreditation assures conformity to general expectations of the institution.’ And this is totally incompatible with any kind of artistic practice.

Clearly, this model implies a conflict of interests with artists, and this radicalisation of positions is used in a very opportune way by those in power and highly placed in these visible spaces. In the new configuration of cultural industries that employ more and more people, artists are found at the lowest level of this hierarchy and are at the tail end of the economic rewards.

As a matter of fact, there are a lot of people earning a living in this world, but it seems like artists are rather ‘risking their lives’. And I ask myself, can the art system support itself without contemporary artists? It seems that many institutions can. Fortunately the practice of art is not only confined to the boundaries of the institution or the marketplace; it can and must find new territories to develop new proposals, and if we can’t find them, we have to invent them. Art, like any cultural process, is basically a process of transmission, transference, of a continuous, permanent and necessary dialogue. But we must not forget that it is also transgression, rupture, irony, parody, appropriation, misappropriation, confrontation, investigation, exploration, interrogation and opposition. Therefore we search for ideal contexts to allow this idea to develop in the best conditions. And if they don’t exist, we have to try to create them.

Iris Dressler: Since the mid-90s we have discussed, experienced and developed through many joint as well as individual projects and processes, critical, collaborative and independent ways of working. One aspect, speaking from the angle of the institution as a place of knowledge production, is how we can understand the institution not only as a place for education but as a learning structure, in the sense of sharing knowledge rather than only distributing it.

Daniel G. Andújar: Social cooperation reveals its power to innovate and create, understood as the best way of supporting a model that permits distribution and expansion of content for participants, users and audiences. Art also has a political role requiring ethical positions; aesthetics are not enough. Those who follow exclusively commercial and institutional models and practices may deem all of this irrelevant, but they must learn to accept being anchored to traditional models that differ radically from those most likely to prevail. For me, artistic practice and the processes involved in generating knowledge are very closely entwined with processes of information transmission, as part of a single collective cultural process.

A tremendously complex world like the one we face that is at the same time profoundly interconnected requires complex procedures of collaboration and education in the collective concept. We need a change, and that change must begin with a redefinition of the artist’s role in society, and even within his or her specific circumstances. I believe this process has to be communicated and shared, and as a result I do not understand the idea of an artistic practice whose formal aspects can be distinguished from supposedly educational ones.

The original concept must become a part of a single idea of a whole, where the workshop and the public exhibition are part of a single goal. The artist’s working space is in turn a set of spaces, not necessarily physical or joined, where he or she works, investigates, celebrates, listens, visits, consults and exchanges, meets and/or argues as part of a complex system. A process prevails which breaks down the classic concept of artistic education, ushering in another concept which is processual, analytical, informative, critical and activist in a reality and a logic which respond to the situation we now live in—an open experience where we share, learn or contribute, where the idea of open social space and collective experience is possible, with a special emphasis on that horizontal idea of exchange, collaboration and de-hierarchised experience.
Iris Dressler: Referring to your ‘Do It Together’ requirement (a reinterpretation of the Web 2.0 generation’s promising slogan “Do-It-Yourself”) as well as to your broad activities in the context of free and open source software, to what extent do the new communication and information technologies offer and demand specific ways of working?

Daniel G. Andújar: The “Do It Yourself” slogan was the Ikea slogan adopted by many artists from the mid-90s on. But it was the wrong one.

As a part of this representational and conceptual development, part of my work uses a number of components that are more or less directly related to free software as a thematic field. The model and the ethical positions of the movement can inspire contemporary art to take new directions in relation to general problems in society. To me, free software’s fundamental abolishment of intellectual property rights represents a chance to structurally and conceptually ‘re-programme’ society for the better, something I used like a metaphor which is shared with much of contemporary art in my opinion.

Information and communication technology and the consequences of globalisation have unquestionably had a transforming influence, dismantling old ways of thinking and operating.

There can be no doubt that this represents a reformulation of the processes of the production, transmission and appropriation of symbolic goods, which forces us to re-examine the models of constructing subjectivity and social organisation. We can see a clear break in the linear guidelines of experiencing time and space, as well as in concepts such as authorship or intellectual and industrial property. We are witnessing a re-examination of individual and collective identities, based on the new multicultural context and the context of diversity, resulting in a crisis in the classic systems of representation and the model of cultural reproduction associated with the nation-state.

We have seen a change in certain processes of collective working and learning, with the emergence of a kind of meritocratic hierarchy based on individual effort working for the collective good and person-to-person relations which are helping to create one of the greatest collective areas for exchange, innovation and creation ever seen in the history of humankind outside the sphere of the public institutions.

While management societies became intermediaries between creators and those in control of production, distribution and commercialisation, new technologies are gradually eliminating the need for these intermediaries and management services. The digital gap, generational clash and many other similar phenomena are challenging our traditional ways of working with, understanding and managing information—and they are also changing our view with regard to negotiating, trading, in short, to living in and understanding the world we inhabit. The tools and resources presented by new information and communication technologies are indissolubly linked to the processes of structural change and to the fundamental transformation taking place in our society. Furthermore, the ways we think, relate to one another, consume, produce and trade are undoubtedly being modified.

The models are continually being defined. Fortunately, current information and communication technologies have created a new framework for action, in which previous situations as well as new scenarios develop, and artists can also take advantage of this. I believe that these changes are creating a crisis in the dominant cultural models of distribution and management.

Iris Dressler: Regarding your various e-projects, I have the impression that especially those connected to the broad involvement of local communities are functioning very well. What have the various experiences with e-valencia, e-barcelona and e-sevilla been with regards to communities?

Daniel G. Andújar: And recently there is e-madrid, which was very well received but also very complex because of its size and the make-up of Madrid’s administration. These e-projects are platforms that approach and question society’s capacity for self-regulation in contexts of discussion and critique when the mechanisms for social control and the regulations imposed by traditional means are de-activated.

This is a tool conceived for collective use and to be implanted locally. Its aim is to exert an influence in certain contexts through the force created by the collective involvement of numerous individual mechanisms, by people or by collectives that are dispersed yet have the capacity to operate, speculate and develop a level of collective knowledge. The Internet’s digital space did not simply emerge as a means of enabling communication, as the public forum that it undoubtedly is. It also emerged as a new theatre for operations defined by social and power relationships.

Thus the e-projects were born in 2001, and a long list of platforms have been developed by or have emerged from social processes or practical workshops, seeking the social participation of collectives and local movements involved in critical processes concerning cultural policies and processes; generating new dynamics, breaking control mechanisms.

The forum responds to the growing instrumentalisation of public processes and is for open, transparent discussion. It gives a voice to that which is not a voice; it gives a voice to cutting criticism and expressive language. Some voices are more justified than others. Some have better manners than others. Some are more morally demanding than others. Such forums have more than what we usually hear or read in other media. They are always pushing the limits, because this is still an artistic project and not a social tool.

Iris Dressler: Your artistic practice connects art and knowledge production, and of course the sharing of knowledge, in a far-reaching sense—even if I think back to a project like the Manfred and Wilhelm Beutel Photo Collection from 1998 that was on show at the Reservate der Sehnsucht exhibition in the former Union Brewery in Dortmund. In inventing a locally focused photo collection, in manipulating images from the city of Dortmund, in constructing a real and at the same time fictitious narrative about Manfred and Wilhelm Beutel (both citizens of Dortmund) and using a high-tech tool for falsifying, the project treated the history of Dortmund, especially those periods for which a certain common awareness was lacking, in quite a complex way. It was a project that addressed the memory of the local public to a great degree.

All of your art projects are based on collaborative research that explores different political, historical, social and cultural phenomena and their media representations in a critical way: body politics, corruption, censorship, xenophobia, urban developments, the cultural industries and the inclusion and exclusion of technologies to name just a few. Moreover you act as curator, conduct many workshops, write articles, are involved in protest activities (for example against the Valencia Biennial or the closing of the IVAM Centre del Carme), publish magazines and web forums, keep up the irational.org project and maintain its server and advise museums as well as initiatives. Since December 2008 you have been the vice president of the Visual Artists Association of Catalonia. In how you work, I see all these different roles related to each other, in the sense that you understand them as separate but connected territories of the collaborative production of art and knowledge and for reclaiming free spaces of action.

Daniel G. Andújar: I do not distinguish between one activity and the other. Art also has a political function and needs to take a clear ethical stance. As I understand it, art cannot limit itself to simply airing great questions about the human and the divine, nor to obeying strategies which are purely aesthetic or marketplace driven; it must rather be committed to and involved in social and political processes.

I think that these are the kinds of territories where visual artists can show signs of commitment and set examples with their work; without them, their ability to act becomes very limited. Historically, their work has been associated with visions that are too egocentric and hyper-individualistic, focusing on the vision of the one-of-a-kind object as the sole material reference to their work. It is something that is transformed into mere exchange value in a market that is also evolving at the same time in its own economic context. As we mentioned earlier, we are caught up in a sweeping process of change which is creating attitudes that allow for the management, on a global level, of different movements in favour of the development of new forms of innovating and creating collectively. These attitudes are also in favour of freely sharing the acquired knowledge and the right to use it. It is a complex global process of cooperation and development that is constantly expanding its interests and growing in participants. They are ways of organising work that have been declared more productive and which are tremendously able to direct these innovations towards the goal of communal interest. Social cooperation reveals its powers of innovation and creation, understood as the best way to support a model that allows for the distribution and expansion of the contents for the participants, the users and the audience. Obviously, artists must belong to the process of change, and it will not be easy to adapt.

We have to demonstrate our ethical commitment with the work we do, incorporating it into the part of the process that develops the various aspects that constitute our social, political and cultural context. We are living through a re-formulation of the processes of the production, transmission and appropriation of symbolic goods that makes us reconsider the models for constructing subjectivity and social organisation.

Walter Benjamin had already written about producers in 1934: “A writer who does not teach other writers teaches nobody. The crucial point, therefore, is that a writer’s production must have the character of a model: it must be able to instruct other writers in their production and, secondly, it must be able to place an improved apparatus at their disposal. This apparatus will be all the better, the more consumers it brings into contact with the production process—in short, the more readers or spectators it turns into collaborators.”

We must begin redefining the role of the artist in this society, even within its specificity, and there is nothing wrong with that—or is this the only field that cannot have a crisis or be in a state of constant change? Aren’t professionals in other disciplines—educators, journalists, scientists—trying to redefine or rethink their role in society, to gradually adapt to change, to find their place in society? A process must be started to break with the classic conception of the artist in order to create a different one which should be processual in nature, akin to the character of an analyst, informer or critic, within a reality of logical answers to the current situation of the exclusionist, bourgeois art institution—the museum, the market, the academic world, the conservative concept of the artist. Artists must offer alternative actions, open spaces of confrontation and criticism.

This implies going into the arena, questioning the structure as a whole and convincing others that we can restructure the entire system using different parameters, processes other than the ones proposed by the current court artists, official portraitists, roundabout artists and decorators in cahoots with the powers that be. We cannot resign ourselves to turning back to the cathedral, painting vaulted ceilings in theatres and decorating the apartments of the construction business’s nouveau riche. Obviously we’re pushing the issue one step further, reformulating a thorough rereading, but I don’t believe that we are doing anything more than observing what is going on around us and questioning it, questioning it all the time, learning to read the reverse of images. It is nothing new.

Iris Dressler: In 1996 you created Technologies To The People® (TTTP) as a vehicle—in the form of a licensed corporation—for reflecting the promises and cynicism towards but also the potential of new technologies in an ironic and at the same time critical way. For a long time TTTP served as a sort of stage and masquerade (I wouldn’t say ‘fake’) that you used to enact double-blind and ambiguous situations: through the TTTP Video Collection in 1997, for example, an online project that pretended to provide download access to a hundred videos from the foremost artists. Whoever tried to download a video went through a never-ending series of error prompts instructing the user to update their browser software, get a faster Internet connection, add memory, install plug-ins and so forth. Finally you received hundreds of angry emails, full of complaints that, for example, the project required overly sophisticated technology and in doing so excluded most of the users. Some enraged artists claimed their copyrights; other people were interested in getting the software—but none of them ever experienced the promised service, since there was of course nothing to download. Basically the project reflected a certain naiveté with respect to the seeming omnipotence and accessibility of new technologies.

I also remember quite well that the TTTP Street Access Machine from 1996, which only existed in an advertising campaign, supposedly gave homeless people access to plastic cash. Apple contacted you, because they were interested in producing the machine. You of course declined, since at that time TTTP—at least as I understand it—was basically a tool or environment for generating gossip and misunderstandings, including with regard to the role of the artist. What function does TTTP serve, or better, how would you describe it today?

Daniel G. Andújar: Technologies To The People came about as a project precisely with the Street Access Machine for the Discord. Sabotage of Realities exhibition that took place at the Kunstverein and the Kunsthaus in Hamburg in 1996. It was the moment when the Internet was being introduced into the domestic sphere and just when the technology bubble was beginning to take shape. It aimed to stress the fact that this new utopia of freedom and global access to information and knowledge that floated in the atmosphere could vanish. The idea of a liberating technology and the Internet as a more democratic space was nothing more than the optimistic vision of a dream that appears unattainable. We surely have little historic ground for an objective perspective of some of the changes, but what was evident was that we were witnessing the flowering of a new conception of power—a power that had become immaterial in the loss of its grounding in material resources. And what was clear was the confirmation that we were witnessing a battle for control of knowledge—above all of information—a fight for it to be managed as a lucrative monopoly on distribution and circulation. We can see this more clearly now. The current crisis is yet another consequence of the state of general mobilisation in the battle for markets, resources and spheres of influence. This new episode reveals the power and repercussions of the new economy. We stand before a digitally connected market whose control mechanisms have contributed to designing a new geography of power, to diminishing state authority and citizens’ rights. And we go on conducting business there, we adapt, we rectify, but essentially we go on working with the same parameters. We work between the small spaces of liberty that we are allowed, using the system’s failures, sneaking through the gaps in it before they are closed up for good. Artistic practice too should become a show of ‘resistance’ to a model that seeks to stubbornly remain in an excessively hierarchised, diffuse, globalised and standardised space of relationships, attempting to pierce through the current structure to clear the way for transformations we understand are necessary. We continue to be interested in exposing the configurations of power, convinced that the practice of art should establish mechanisms for social relations that help to insure its impact in the long term and allow the discourse to be moved beyond restricted confines to the art audience and the institution itself.

Iris Dressler: Since 1996, when we first met in Dortmund during your residency at the Künstlerhaus, there has been a certain kind of transition observable in your work: it went from intervention in the urban public space to interventions in the virtual spaces of the Internet. Of course, you still deal with and act within various ‘realities’. But how do you understand the differences and connections between environments like the city, the Internet, the museum and the ‘old media’?

Daniel G. Andújar: The public space forms the basis on which I operate as an artist and so I reflect on it and formulate questions about it. Reclaiming the public space is a historical constant that is continually being redefined; we are currently working within a very confined space, subject to constant pressures. It is necessary to expand this space, and to do so we must be very alert to proceedings directed towards limiting the use and enjoyment of these free spaces. Every working context is conditioned in different ways. The conditions for reading the situations are different, and as such expressing which practices to follow is also different for each case. The city is the point of reference for the public space as we have known it until very recently; it is subject to a complex system of relationships and ongoing negotiation. The Web, as a public space, is also determined by social and power relationships and by a system of negotiation quite similar to that of the city. By contrast, the spaces marked off for developing artistic practices are specially designed and the result of a historical evolution with the aim of creating a base for structuring artistic language. It is a specific, restricted, protected space for a highly defined cultural process. As artists we should invest much more in its management, evolution and transformation, or we should abandon it once and for all, in which case its function will remain limited and subservient to the service and entertainment industries. As regards the media, the traditional media, i.e., radio, television and the print media can no longer continue to support themselves as a fundamental pillar of a structure that has been foundering for some time—it has already had its turn and its methods are being contended. Unilateral, closed, defined discourses that do not offer an opportunity for responding, participating or being managed collectively are no longer accepted.

Iris Dressler: One aspect that characterises your work is that it constantly moves between a polemic/ironic simplification and complexity. Your presentation of Postcapital in Stuttgart suggested a clear, somehow dualistic and chronological structure at first sight: left/right, 1989-2001, communism/capitalism and so forth. But one was immediately ensnared just in constantly being forced to decide where to go, since despite all of the exhibition’s architecturally clear structures, it had no obvious course. It was clear and unclear at the same time. And the more you entered the space the more you found yourself in a labyrinthine situation, gradually surrounded by more and more materials, opening up more and more aspects.

To me, art has a specific potential to generate complexity, in the sense that it allows things to appear in their multiple, contradictory realities: they become readable in one direction and another at the same time.

Daniel G. Andújar: My intention thereby was to create a system of complex relationships with the audience, a dialogue that allowed the viewer to establish an interactive relationship with the project itself, constructing contradictory, even antagonistic relations requiring that all the visual grammar on display be called into doubt.

Taking decisions, deciding, is an aspect I am interested in exploring as part of the process of interacting. It compels you to take breaks during the viewing, to evaluate the different aspects and to study the assorted options presented before choosing. It’s a process of construction that prompts you to solve something, to doubt or respond, to be critical about what you see and question its structure.

Iris Dressler: In another conversation you mentioned that one point of departure for the Postcapital project was a discussion you had with Iván de La Nuez about the consequences of being born at more or less the same time (in the mid-60s, that is) but in quite different situations: you in the capitalist conditions of ‘the West’, and he in the communist conditions of ‘the South’. When Postcapital—as an exhibition project—opened in 2006 at Palau de la Virreina in Barcelona with the additional title Politics, the city, money, as a collaboration between you, the Cuban writer and director of Palau de la Virreina, Iván de La Nuez, and the Cuban artist Carlos Garacoia, it was basically organised along the lines of the opposition between the ideologies of the ‘left’ and the ‘right’. At the entrance, visitors already had to decide whether to go left or right, that is, to experience the course—following the symmetrical spatial order of Palau de la Virreina—from left to right or from right to left. There was no option to enter the exhibition straight ahead (from midway), as this option was blocked by a large table hosting dripping candles in the shape of architectural icons, a work by Carlos Garacoia.

Daniel G. Andújar: The discussion was centred on questions of specific contexts. You cannot choose where you are born and how, nor normally where you want to live. There are elements that depend on chance and which we cannot control; others, conversely, depend directly on the social, cultural, political and economic conditions that define our context. A dialogue envisaging personal circumstances as a set of dichotomies, contradictions, affirmations and negations was proposed at the start of the project. From there we would adopt certain strategies when deciding on the project’s space, route and interpretation. The design obliged visitors to make decisions that influenced how the project was read in an objective way. We played with very simple metaphors of left and right, directions and routes, colours associated with the political imaginary. In this decision-making, chance, fortuitousness and coincidence also determine the reading of the project, as is true of life itself.

Iris Dressler: One interesting experience at Postcapital in Stuttgart was that it was perceived quite differently by the different generations of visitors. The so-called collective or common memory of media images—even of media icons—from the 1950s to the present varies greatly between those born in the 1940s and those born in the 1980s. It seems to me that media images, in spite of their impact, are somehow lost and forgotten very quickly. Furthermore, it seems that today the different generations are living in quite different environments in terms of images and information. It’s more parallel and ‘special-interest’ oriented than it is common knowledge and memory.

Daniel G. Andújar: We are still engaged in a process of digitisation that is transferring a good part of our visual legacy from its formal physical format. All of this information is being placed in containers located on a new plane near the public space with high visibility and accessibility. This circumstance generates a new saturated, ornate and noisy visual panorama, creating a new landscape that will modify the relationships with our imaginary. We can generate and consume content very quickly, but also modify and retrieve it with the same swiftness from an enormous archive continually being created and examined. The primary transformation in the era of the information society is the evolution of habits in public and as an audience, to the point that we can speak of a new era of participation and interpretation. The audience no longer wants to be limited to receiving information, loathes being the passive subject of cultural processes that exclude, and wants to interact with these new media, participating in the process of transmitting information and being an active part of this information’s evolution and transformation into knowledge.

Iris Dressler: Postcapital brings many layers into play. It’s an ongoing, process-based and collaborative project, consisting of different modules which are connected to each other but also work independently and which together do not form a closed entity, since every single module opens up multiple discourses that always refer beyond themselves. It reminds me a bit—in a positive sense—of a Hydra, which could of course also be the perfect metaphor for the ‘archive culture’ itself. In this vein, Postcapital also seems to me like a process that explores questions anew from step to step and in doing so generates new and unexpected questions.

Daniel G. Andújar: Formulating questions is a very important part of the artistic praxis. I wanted to get away from unilateral, closed, defined discourses affording no possibility for response, participation or interaction. The projects reproduce processes, and these processes normally imply a certain level of complexity that we should not seek to conceal.

Iris Dressler: Postcapital. Politics, the city, money intertwined spatial stagings of elements from your archive, works by Carlos Garacoia and Iván de La Nuez’s involvement on the theory side. In Chile (2007) it appeared as a poster which was distributed in the public space, showing—as a single item from the archive—a copy of a document containing nothing but the classification stamp used in Chile during the dictatorship. In Istanbul (2008) Postcapital took the shape of a workshop; in Dortmund (2008), one module of the project, the “Postcapital Library”, was part of a group exhibition on copyright issues, presented as the display of an enormous ‘conference table’ with a tower in the centre. In Montreal (2008) “Honor”, another module of the project, was part of the Mediating Conflict exhibition. In Stuttgart (2008) once again, Postcapital (Archive 1989-2001) was accompanied by two workshops (one conducted by you, another by Yvonne P. Doderer), a large number of lectures and a programme of films curated by Katrin Mundt. Regarding these various presentations and their ramifications, Postcapital basically works as a resource for different activities and is in this sense quite an ephemeral project—a resource and catalyst for ongoing communication and processes. Even now in Venice, Postcapital is part of the Catalan Pavilion as an installation and part of one of the Turkish Pavilion’s publications as a case study.

Daniel G. Andújar: There is neither a defined format nor a project in the strict sense. We speak of tools, platforms, archives and educational processes. The spaces are thought out in terms of their transformative capacity and not as merely functional structures. They are platforms for constructing meanings and producing significance, designed as a mechanism for criticising hierarchies and the possibility of enabling tools and means of production for modifying the reality that has come about and constructing new subjectivities. We are trying to define a specific context that allows us to learn to learn—managing knowledge through managing the performance space itself.

Iris Dressler: Your artistic practice has for years been based on the re-rereading, re-appropriation and re-contextualisation of existing audiovisual material. In this regard, you are a long-term archivist. With Postcapital you not only question the archive itself as a depository for knowledge production (namely a depository in transition), you also give public access to your way of working in a double sense: in the form of your audiovisual and spatial interpretation of the collected material, and in the form of your archive, which is of course related to selection and interpretation as well. Not even the search engines you use are neutral or non-intentional, since there is no neutral technology and no neutral use of it. In this sense, the status of interpretation is an important issue in the Postcapital project: as a more or less controlled/controlling filter, but also as the potential for a more open, complex and critical reading. Postcapital (Archive 1989-2001) in Stuttgart was dominated by a huge architectonic structure that shifted between a sculptural ensemble reminiscent of modernist aesthetics, the silhouette of a city, and elements of a stage. This structure was accompanied in the foreground by a low circular monitor installation and framed by a frieze of images covering the walls of the exhibition space. These three elements generated an initial sort of picture (or stage setting) of the exhibition. The architectural structure could be entered from two sides—one showing a video montage of people storming (or trying to storm) walls, the other a camera panning round and round a satellite image of Manhattan (ending at Ground Zero). Inside the ‘building ensemble’, visitors could explore various spaces with materials from the archive, revolving around different aspects. And finally the scenario behind the architectonic structure (or behind the picture) was organised like a workshop area and like the backstage of a city. In your contribution to the exhibition On Difference #1 you had already organised the presentation like two sides of a picture.

Daniel G. Andújar: Visual language is the most valuable tool in artistic practice, but ‘the visual’ is currently specifically associated with contemporary digital territory, digital recreation, publicity; we artists are no longer the only ones capable of influencing the visual imaginary, and not only that, but I think we have lost part of this capacity. Perhaps it is the moment to stop making more noise and to create more images. This doesn’t necessarily mean stopping working with images. We should join this battle and shoulder certain responsibilities: discover what is behind the images, teach how to decode them, help to open the code to the visual framework, showing the reverse side of all of this, laying bare its entrails. It is a language full of capabilities, but it is caught up in the struggle for control over it. Language can change the world, or it should.

Iris Dressler: Another element of the ‘backstage scenario’ in Stuttgart was a huge tower or podium, breaking through the ceiling and concealing the server.

Daniel G. Andújar: In playing with these aspects, I am interested in emphasising the audience’s inability to access the top of the podium, to climb up the tower and take the reins of the discourse. My work is about de-hierarchising these processes. No-one may raise their voice above others’ voices, and so I don’t let anyone do so. This is why I always position the server, the ‘archive’, beneath the tower, as a mechanism for distributing information that works at floor level, feeding the other elements that make up the installation. This is an attempt to indicate that what has held the tower upright for so long is precisely its hidden mechanisms. Let’s learn to use them.

Iris Dressler: We have often been asked why the Postcapital Archive is not available on the Internet. To me this aspect in fact has nothing to do with the project; it is not about having an open online database, but rather about the complex problems of reading and understanding information in the age of the Internet. The confrontation between your spatial (and spatially experienceable) interpretation of the material—constantly changing from site to site and context to context—and the archive as, again, the result of decisions and filters, is crucial. You cannot take away either one part or the other.

Daniel G. Andújar: In this information society, the basic resource will be knowledge, and the will to apply knowledge to generate more knowledge should be grounded in a heightened effort to systematise and organise it, demanding that learning be lifelong. This was the big change, beyond mere formal questions about the media.

In a short space of time we have gone from visiting the museum, the library, the archive, to living within the archive itself. We do not, as individuals, have the ability, time or memory to comprehend the entire system. Researchers tell us that the human being’s working memory capacity is limited to remembering four things and no more, although we can use tricks like repeating something many times or grouping and classifying things. How, then, are we going to manage this vast quantity of documents, information, images and so on? We have to generate mechanisms that allow us to transform all this noisy mess into specific knowledge to be able to develop any of the particular nuances of our personalities. And we have to undertake this in a collective way, seeking new mechanisms from a number of fields and disciplines, certainly beginning with education. I propose creating a true culture of the archive, learning to learn from the context of a wealth of choices—life within the archive, in a knowledge society that gives options and requires us to choose again and again, to learn without limits, to value new opportunities and confront numerous challenges and puzzles; a knowledge society that is unacquainted with genre work, that calls old classifications, control systems, hierarchies, legitimacies, values and so on into doubt.

Share:

Tags: 2009, Interview, Iris Dressler

On és la bretxa? Debat obert sobre el funcionament de la cadena de valor en les Arts Visuals

admin — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:33:49 +0000

10 de desembre de 2009 al TPK Arts Plàstiques (Av. Josep Tarradellas, 44. L’Hospitalet de Llobregat). Organitza: Xarxaprod.

PROGRAMACIÓ SESSIÓ TARDA ( Oberta al públic)

Transmissió per streaming a càrrec de ComafoscaTV (http://comafoscatv.net)

16:30-17:45h- Ponència/conferència de presentació del sector de la producció científica: funcionament i relacions entre els agents actius. A càrrec de Reimond Fickert.

17:45-18:00h- Pausa, cafè.

18:00- 20:00h- La sostenibilitat del sector de les Arts Visuals vist des de la seva cadena de valor i des dels vincles necessaris per al sistema.

Modera: Francesca Minguella (PARTners). Participen: Daniel García Andújar, Alicia Vela, Ramon Parramon, Jorge Luis Marzo i Àngels de la Mota.

Share:

Tags: 2009, Conca, xarxaprod

Territoris de Fricció

admin — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:13:30 +0000

Del 4 de desembre de 2009 al 17 de gener de 2010
Exposició comissariada per Miquel Bardagil

////////////////////// ACVIC Centre d’Arts Contemporànies. Vic [en procés]

C. Sant Francesc, 1. E-08500 VIC / tel ++34 938853704 //////////////////////

Una mirada des de la col·lecció d’art contemporani del Museu d’Art Jaume Morera de Lleida

dilluns, 16 / novembre / 2009
Organitza:
ACVIC. Centre d’Art
Ajuntament de Vic
Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura i Mitjans de Comunicació
H.Associació per a les Arts Contemporànies
Museu d’Art Jaume Morera
Ajuntament de Lleida

Amb la col·laboració de:
Centre d’Art la Panera

Per més informació: descarregar arxiu.pdfEtiquetes de comentaris: activitats

Share:

Tags: 2009, ACVIC, Centre d'Art la Panera, Miquel Bardagil, Museu d'Art Jaume Morera de Lleida, Vic

El pabellón catalán en la Bienal de Venecia recibió 45.633 visitas

admin — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:00:00 +0000

BARCELONA, 30 Nov. (EUROPA PRESS) -
El pabellón catalán en la Bienal de Venecia 2009 recibió un total de 45.633 visitas durante los casi seis meses que estuvo instalado en el Magazzino del Sale número 3. El director del Institut Ramon Llull (IRL), Josep Bargalló, se mostró hoy satisfecho por esta cifra ya que, además, era la primera vez que Catalunya asistía a este encuentro.

Destacó que el 12,9% de los visitantes que tuvo la Bienal (375.702) pasaron por el pabellón catalán pese a que no estaba con el grueso de los pabellones, en los Giardini y el Arsenale.

La intención es que la cultura catalana repita presencia en la próxima edición, que se celebrará en 2011, pero Bargalló dejó en el aire la ubicación: “Al principio teníamos que estar en el Palau Fortuny pero no fuimos porque tenían que hacer obras, y aún no han empezado”, observó, por lo que las obras que se tienen que hacer en el Magazzino del Sale 3 quizás impidan que Catalunya repita ubicación.

Lo que seguro que no cambiará será la forma de elegir a la representación catalana: el IRL designará un jurado internacional, diferente al de esta primera participación, y éste pondrá las reglas de un concurso al que concurrirán los que quieran comisariar la propuesta catalana. Durante el primer trimestre de 2010 se convocará este concurso, avanzó Bargalló.

El comisario de esta edición, Valentín Roma, se mostró contento por el “nivel de complejidad” de la propuesta que llevaron a la Bienal, un proyecto basado en la documentación, valor que les distinguió, dijo el comisario.

La exposición ‘Venezia, Catalunya 2009. La Comunitat Inconfessable’ contenía los proyectos ‘Sitesize’ de Joan Vila-Puig y Elvira Pujol; ‘Technologies to the People’, de Daniel G. Andújar, y ‘Archivo F.X.’, de Pedro G. Romero.

Una adaptación de estas propuestas llegará el 4 de febrero al centro de arte Bòlit de Girona, donde estarán hasta finales de abril complementados con charlas.

Bargalló indicó que “pronto” se sabrá la naturaleza de la presencia catalana de 2011, ahora que el IRL reúne a la Generalitat de Catalunya y al Gobierno balear, por lo que existe la duda de si la representación será conjunta en Venecia.

Cuestionado por la intencionalidad de la presencia catalana en esta Bienal, Bargalló dijo que tiene claro que para “suplir los déficits del país” se tiene que utilizar la política, no la cultura. Ésta sirve, a su entender, “para explicar al mundo” que Catalunya tiene una identidad “viva, no basada sólo en el folclore”.

Share:

Tags: 2009, Biennal de Venècia, La Comunidad Inconfesable, pabellón catalán

iD Barrio. Seminario internacional + taller de proyectos |Barcelona

admin — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:51:48 +0000

iD Barrio | Barcelona
Seminario: 27 – 28 noviembre 2009
Taller KUNSTrePUBLIK: 30 noviembre – 4 diciembre 2009
Taller de Traces of Autism: 30 noviembre – 4 diciembre 2009

Inscripciones: idensitat@idensitat.net . El plazo de inscripción para el seminario en Calaf finaliza el 31 de octubre.Para el seminario y talleres en Barcelona el 12 de noviembre.

iD Barrio es un proyecto vinculado a iD#5 que explora la idea de barrio desde la perspectiva urbana y a través de la relación entre arte, creatividad social y transformación del entorno. Consta de tres partes interrelacionadas: seminario, taller y exposición de proyectos [Dispositivo Itinerante], comunicación y consulta de proyectos. Este proyecto se desarrollará en Calaf y Barcelona, permitiendo trabajar el tema del barrio desde el contexto de ciudades pequeñas y medianas en áreas rurales y en relación con el área urbana.

iD Barrio mediante los seminarios de Calaf y Barcelona plantea que el arte puede ser un factor de innovación en los procesos de transformación de la ciudad , ya que es capaz de hacer emerger la creatividad social latente y desplegarla a través de acciones colectivas. Los seminarios cuentan con la participación de: Sergi Alegre, Colectivo Amasté, Daniel G. Andujar, Colectivo Basurama, Paola Di Bello, Viviana Bravo, Joan Caballol, Casal de Calaf, Hans D.Christ, Santiago Cirugeda, Francesca Comisso, Manuel Delgado, Iris Dressler, Paula González, Horitzó TV, Colectivo LUL, Colectivo KUNSTrePUBLIK, Fadhila Mammar, Josep-Maria Martín, Gary W. McDonogh, Francesc Muñoz, Oriol Nel.lo, Jose Luis Oyon, Martín di Peco, Martí Peran, Plataforma Tenim un Problema, Josep Puigpelat, Marta Ricart, Montserrat Santolino, Colectivo Sin|studio, Colectivo Traces of Autism, Colectivo TUP, Jordi Vidal, Loïc Wacquant..

iD Barrio | Barcelona
Creatividad social, acción colectiva y prácticas artísticas

Seminario: 27 – 28 noviembre 2009
en Barcelona se realizará un seminario de dos días de duración centrado en el entorno urbano a partir de la creatividad, la participación y las prácticas artísticas. Se pondrá especial énfasis en la gestión de los procesos participativos, las dinámicas de trabajo en entornos locales en relación con procesos y discursos ultralocales. Artistas, agentes culturales, expertos y estudiosos de los procesos de transformación de la ciudad y proyectos activos en barrios específicos confluyen para analizar diferencias y trazar puntos de conexión desde los respectivos campos de acción.

Contenidos y participantes

Viernes 27 de noviembre

11.00h
Prácticas artísticas y espacios de acción social. (El contexto local y la dinámica global en el espacio institucional cultural).

Hans D.Christ, Iris Dressler. Directores del WKV Württembergischer Kunstverein Stuttgart. Han comisariado numerosos proyectos, entre ellos, On Difference. Políticas del espacio acerca de la expropiación y re-apropiación de los espacios de acción social, política y cultural.
Daniel G. Andújar. Fundador de Technologies To The People y director de numerosos proyectos en internet como art.net.dortmund, e-barcelona.org o e-valencia.org. Su trabajo cuestiona las promesas democráticas e igualitarias de las nuevas tecnologías de la comunicación.
Jordi Vidal. Director de HEART, Haute École d’Art de Perpignan,Francia. Entre sus libros se puede destacar Résistance au chaos; Traité du combat moderne: Films et fictions de Stanley Kubrick; Servitude et simulacre en temps réel et flux constant y L’Extinction des Lumières que se publicará en el 2010.
Judi Werthein. Artista. Su trabajo ha sido mostrado en el Tate Modern, el Centrum Beeldende Kunst en Rótterdam, Stichting de Appel en Ámsterdam, Museo del Barrio (Nueva York) entre otros, y ha participado en eventos internacionales como InSite_05 (Tijuana) y Manifesta7.

17.00h
Arquitectura activa y cartografía viva. Espacios para el intercambio de experiencias.

Basurama. Colectivo dedicado a la investigación y gestión cultural que ha centrado su área de estudio y actuación en los procesos productivos, la generación de desechos que estos implican y las posibilidades creativas que suscita esta coyuntura contemporánea.
Santiago Cirugeda. Arquitecto. Desarrolla proyectos de subversión en distintos ámbitos de la realidad urbana. Actualmente involucrado en proyectos de autoconstrucción en varias ciudades españolas, donde grupos de ciudadanos deciden generar sus propios espacios urbanos.
Martín di Peco. Arquitecto por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Forma parte de diversos colectivos de experimentación e investigación sobre sociedad – arte – territorio.
Sin|studio. Grupo de creadores emergentes dedicado a la investigación del ámbito de confluencia entre la arquitectura, el arte y otros campos de conocimiento. Desarrollan proyectos de intervención en espacios públicos, con objeto de trabajar sobre las condiciones de contextos sociales concretos.
Traces of Autism. Colectivo interdisciplinario que trabaja sobre el análisis y cartografía del territorio realizando largos recorridos por el espacio público para producir un archivo de elementos encontrados, traduciéndolo en mapas, textos, imágenes y videos.
Martí Peran. Comisario independiente y profesor de teoría del arte en la Universitat de Barcelona. Recientemente ha impulsado el proyecto Ciutats Ocasionals y comisariado Arquitectures sense lloc. Es miembro editor de “Roulotte” y colabora con varias revistas de arte (Exit Express, Artforum International).

20.00h
Inauguración de la exposición Dispositivo Itinerante.

Sábado 28 de noviembre

11.00h
Mediación creativa y barrio en los procesos de intervención artística.

Francesca Comisso. Comisaria y miembro del colectivo a.titolo, dedicado a las prácticas artísticas que tratan sobre las dimensiones sociales y políticas del espacio público. Es profesora en el Politécnico de Turín.
Paola di Bello. Artista. Profesora de fotografía en el Brera Academy of Arts, Milano. Su trabajo explora problemas socio-políticos que definen la ciudad contemporánea.
Viviana Bravo. Artista visual especializada en Integración entre Arte y Arquitectura. Realiza proyectos colaborativos e intervenciones vinculadas a espacios públicos en conflicto. Es profesora de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Chile y en la Escuela de Artes de la Universidad del Desarrollo.
KUNSTrePUBLIK. Colectivo de artistas que produce proyectos y genera estrategias in situ para espacios públicos no usados y mutables.

17.00h
El barrio, participación y gestión de la diferencia.

Gary W. McDonogh. Antropólogo. Director y profesor del Program in Growth and Structure of Cities. Bryn Mawr Collage, Philadelphia.
Fadhila Mammar. Licenciada en Filología Española por la Universidad de Grenoble (Francia) y Túnez. Master en Migraciones, Refugio y Relaciones Intercomunitarias. Es mediadora, y experta en Mediación Intercultural.
José Luis Oyon. Arquitecto profesor de la Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Entre sus libros cabe destacar: Atlas histórico de ciudades europeas; Barcelona, 1930: un atlas social; El cinturón rojinegro y La quiebra de la ciudad popular.
Montserrat Santolino. Periodista. Representante de la Associació Cultural Florida-Waslala, que ha participado en el Plan de Desarrollo Comunitario del barrio y en el proceso de definición del Plan Integral, ampliado gracias a la Ley de barrios.
Sergi Alegre Calero. Teniente de alcalde de Urbanismo, Territorio y Medio Ambiente y concejal del Plan de Actuación de Sant Cosme, Ayuntamiento del Prat de Llobregat.
Loïc Wacquant. Sociólogo. Autor de los Condenados de la ciudad. Ha analizado los suburbios de Paris y diferentes ciudades americanas. Profesor de sociología en la Universidad de Berkeley, California. [Participa en el seminario con un texto que se distribuirá entre los asistentes].

20.00h
Programación de vídeos comentados sobre temáticas de acción colectiva en el contexto de barrio. A cargo de Manuel Delgado, antropólogo y profesor de la Universitat de Barcelona.

Viernes 4 de diciembre

18.00h
Presentación de proyectos del taller KUNSTrePUBLIK.
20.30h
Presentación del proyecto Històries i Llocs de Sans Façon, promovido en colaboración entre Idensitat y Priorat Centre d’Art con la participación de DO Montsant y la colaboración del celler El Masroig y el celler Aibar. Habrá degustación de vino de la DO Montsant.

Taller KUNSTrePUBLIK: 30 noviembre – 4 diciembre 2009
El taller estará dirigido por el colectivo KUNSTrePUBLIK [Markus Lohmann, Harry Sachs, Philip Horst, Daniel Seiple, Matthias Einhoff]. En el taller se harán propuestas de trabajo específicas que estarán orientadas a poner en relación la exploración del territorio, el análisis del espacio con el activismo sociocultural y la participación. El taller será de carácter transdisciplinar, combinando personas que trabajan en contextos de barrio con artistas, arquitectos y diseñadores. El taller de Kunstrepublik se realizará en el barrio del Raval y se utilitzará La Capella como espacio de trabajo.
Autores del trabajo Skulpturenpark Berlin_Zentrum, http://www.skulpturenpark.org/

Taller Traces of Autism: 30 noviembre – 4 diciembre 2009
El taller será dirigido por el colectivo Traces of Autism [Jozua Zaagman, Maartje Dros, Jacqueline Schoemaker]. Colectivo interdisciplinario que trabaja sobre el análisis y cartografía del territorio realizando largos recorridos por el espacio público para producir un archivo de elementos encontrados, traduciéndolo en mapas, textos, imágenes y videos. El taller consistirá en aplicar esta metodología de trabajo en un barrio de Barcelona.

Dirección de los seminarios: Gaspar Maza, antropólogo, profesor de la Universitat Rovira i Virgili de Tarragona y Ramon Parramon, director de Idensitat y profesor de Elisava.

Inscripciones
La inscripción en los seminarios y talleres de Calaf y Barcelona es gratuita. Los interesados en participar en los talleres impartidos por Kunstrepublik y Traces of Autism en Barcelona, o en el taller d’Horitzó TV en Calaf deben presentar un texto de motivación y un currículum. Por formalizar la inscripción se debera enviar un email a idensitat@idensitat.net . El plazo de inscripción finaliza el 31 de octubre. En el caso de los seminarios las plazas son limitadas al aforo. En el caso de los talleres se seleccionará a los participantes según la documentación presentada.

Lugar y fechas
iD Barri| Calaf.
Lugar: Espai HivernacleCultural, c. Francesc Macià, 8. 08280 Calaf
Seminario: 14 i 15 de novembre de 2009.
Taller: 6, 7 i 13 de novembre de 2009.
En Calaf se podrán utilizar las instalaciones del IES Alexandre de Riquer como alojamiento durante el fin de semana del 13 al 15 de noviembre. Deberá solicitarse con antelación.

iD Barri | Barcelona.
Lugar: La Capella. C.Hospital, 56. 08001 Barcelona . Tel 93 442 71 71
Seminario: 27-28 noviembre 2009
Taller: del 30 noviembre al 4 diciembre 2009
Exposición Dispositivo Itinerante: del 26 de noviembre al 8 de diciembre.

iD Barrio | Calaf es una propuesta de IDENSITAT en colaboración con el Ajuntament de Calaf y forma parte del proyecto ARTWORK’09 de la Diputació de Barcelona. Este proyecto está subvencionado por el programa de Projectes Innovadors según la Orden TRE/337/2008, patrocinado por el Servei d’Ocupació de Catalunya i cofinanciado por el Fondo Social Europeo.

iD Barrio | Barcelona, es una propuesta de IDENSITAT para La Capella. Ajuntament de Barcelona en colaboración con el Goethe Institut, el Consulado General de los Países Bajos en Barcelona y Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura.

IDENSITAT es un proyecto de arte que investiga sobre las maneras de incidir en el ámbito del espacio público a través de propuestas creativas en relación al lugar y el territorio desde la dimensión física y social. Constituye una plataforma de producción e investigación en red, en el ámbito de lo artístico, donde experimentar nuevas formas de implicación e interacción en el espacio social. Desde hace 10 años desarrolla proyectos artísticos en Calaf y actualmente trabaja en varios contextos urbanos. Los proyectos desarrollados en los talleres formarán parte del archivo de Idensitat con la voluntad de encontrar mecanismos de producción para aquellos que se ajusten a dinámicas específicas vinculadas al contexto local.

IDENSITAT está impulsado por Ayuntamiento de Calaf, Ayuntamiento de Manresa, Departamento de Cultura y Medios de comunicación de la Generalitat de Catalunya y Diputación de Barcelona. Desarrolla proyectos compartidos con Can Xalant, Centre de Creació i Pensament Contemporani de Mataró, Priorat Centre d’Art, Ayuntamiento del Prado de Llobregat, Consonni (Sondika), La Capella (Barcelona) y Hangar (Barcelona). Forma parte de la red de espacios de producción Xarxaprod.Iinscripciones: idensitat@idensitat.net

Share:

Tags: 2009, Barcelona, Idensitat, La Capella

Tecnología transparente

admin — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:55:44 +0000

- José Manuel Costa

ABC.abcd

LABoral es el mayor centro español dedicado a las prácticas emergentes, el de mayor presupuesto y apoyos y el que desde un principio mostraba toda la intención de integrarse en los nuevos diálogos internacionales en torno a esas prácticas que, entre otras peculiaridades, poseen las de ser cada vez más integradoras de todo tipo de estímulos sensoriales y más difusas en sus mecanismos de creación y distribución.

En la actualidad, presenta cinco exposiciones de muy diferente porte, pero que ayudan a hacerse una idea sobre por dónde pueden ir estas historias. Por ejemplo, Donkijote.org, un nombre no demasiado afortunado para una acción que tiene como protagonista a un burro sanchopancesco más que un jamelgo quijotesco.

Burro grande.
El proyecto, del italiano Cristian Bettini, resultó ganador del concurso Digital-LAB?09 y es tan sencillo como ingenioso: realizar tres recorridos por el agreste territorio asturiano caminando junto a un burro cargado de tecnología. Interacción a tres niveles: el encuentro con los lugareños, lo que puedan ir indicando los usuarios de Internet en la página homónima y una presencia física en LABoral, cuyo funcionamiento tiene algo de taller y de exposición. La parte de internet no funciona como podría, pero la interacción física me parece interesante. Primero porque supone empujar al museo hacia el mundo exterior, pero también porque lo verdaderamente chocante para la gente, no son el GPS o el portátil, sino? el burro. Aquí ya hay un primer apunte de algo que vendrá más adelante: esas tecnologías han llegado a un nivel de divulgación y uso que las transforma en transparentes.

Otra exposición es una fotográfica llamada Cambio climático. No es cosa de detenerse mucho: está bien como compromiso con el tema y muchas de las fotos seleccionadas son muy decentes. Más curiosa es una exposición de juegos alternativos en la Mediateca Expandida. Arcadia presenta un buen número de juegos de ordenador o consola que tratan de ser diferentes y se caracterizan más por sus ideas y peculiares estéticas que por sus altos valores de producción.

Se agradece que un colectivo como L.I.B.A. pueda presentar en una sala muy colateral del lugar una instalación como Desea, piensa, parpadea, bien pensada, hecha con poco dinero y resultona. El visitante entra en una habitación en penumbra y va de objeto a objeto, iluminados de forma secuencial, y ve dirigidos sus pasos por dicha secuencia, posiblemente aleatoria y que funciona muy bien en el «Piensa» y el «Parpadea», pero menos en el capítulo «Desea».

Pero la estrella de la oferta es claramente FeedForward. Esta exposición viene a ser la segunda parte de FeedBack, realizada hace poco más de dos años en el mismo lugar por la misma comisaria, Christiane Paul, una gran experta en estas nuevas prácticas. Mientras la idea de la primera, la retroalimentación, era relativamente sencilla, FeedForward, es decir la «ante-alimentación» sería un concepto mucho más complejo.

Paul y su compañero de comisariado, Steve Dietz, han echado mano de una gran y terrible referencia: El Ángel de la Historia tal y como lo describió un Walter Benjamin desesperado y al borde del suicidio en Port Bou, en relación a una obra de Paul Klee, Angelus Novus: «Donde a nosotros se nos manifiesta una cadena de datos, él ve una catástrofe única que amontona incansablemente ruina sobre ruina, arrojándolas a sus pies».

Ante la catástrofe.
La enseñanza puede ser que lo único factible en nuestro transcurso hacia el futuro es mantener los ojos bien abiertos, aunque sea mirando esa pila de escombros que va acumulando ese viento que Benjamin bautizaba como el del progreso. Y quizás influir de alguna manera para que la catástrofe vaya ralentizándose.

Lo primero que llama la atención es la arquitectura. Ángel Borrego ha encontrado una solución simplemente genial: las salas han sido separadas por grandes marcos de madera industrial y tejido translúcido que permite intuir instalaciones lejanas sin interferir la relación con las más cercanas. La contaminación acústica se limita con campanas de proyección local. Sobre esta base se presentan 29 trabajos llenos de sentido. Tan llenos como que lo menos importante son los recursos tecnológicos sobre los que operan. De manera que el sentido vuelve a adquirir protagonismo frente al descubrimiento técnico.

Hay quien, como Margot Lovejoy, se toma el lema de la exposición de manera literal, pero aunque el resto de las piezas no lo compartan, prácticamente todas mantienen un tono altamente crítico. La instalación de Harwood, Wright y Yokokoji está dedicada a las guerras de coltán en África Central; Bárbara Fluxá practica la arqueología de nuestro inmediato pasado a través de un seat 127 abandonado en el río Nalón; Langlands+Bell, Nonny de la Peña y Peggy Weil, T+T o Stephanie Rothenberg utilizan técnicas de realidad virtual para tratar temas como Guantánamo o el Muro de Berlín; Daniel García Andujar utiliza el ordenador como una inmensa biblioteca de filosofía y pensamiento? FeedForward es una exposición de tesis sobre la contemporaneidad, y nada es más lógico que tratar la contemporaneidad en sus propios lenguajes. Esto no es física recreativa; es arte político.

Share:

Tags: 2009, Archivo, Laboral, Postcapital

Feedforward. The Angel of History.

admin — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:02:16 +0000

By Regine www.we-make-money-not-art.com

Part 1: Wreckage and countermeasures

Feedforward. The Angel of History, a compelling exhibition that opened a few weeks ago at LABoral in Gijón, addresses the current moment in history where the wreckage of political conflict and economic inequality is piling up, while globalized forces–largely enabled by the “progress” of digital information technologies–inexorably feed us forward. The exhibition title references Paul Klee’s watercolor Angelus Novus. Walter Benjamin saw it as depicting “the angel of history” transfixed by the wreckage of the past that is accumulating in front of him while being propelled into the uncertain future by progress.

View of the exhibition space: upstairs

Curated by Steve Dietz and Christiane Paul, the show explores a 21st century made of deep inequalities, complex tensions and a general feeling of instability. Can we count on the media to reflect accurately the political and cultural landscape? Are the media addressing and monitoring the disturbances that surround us? Or are they instead accomplice to the situation?

View of the exhibition space: downstairs

If the media do not do what we expect from them, can art step in? Which kind of role can artists play in this scenario? Is providing feedback to what they observe enough? Shouldn’t we instead hope that they will adopt a more “feed-forward” attitude and inspire greater awareness and collective reaction?

The 29 artworks on show do not pretend to provide all the answers nor to cover the full spectrum of the dilemmas and tensions of our time but they explore them under many different angles. The art pieces are distributed according to five themes. One of them investigates the “wreckage” of the 21th century created by conflicts, corruption, economical inequalities, terrorism and corporatism.

Proyecto Coche: excavando el final del siglo XX. Image Barbara Fluxá

Proyecto Coche explores the wreckage quite literally. A few years ago, Barbara Fluxá discovered a Seat 127 car in the Nalón River, Asturias. Together with an archaeologist she excavated the car and documented its removal, conservation and transformation into a beautifully polished debris.

The car’s specific re-discovery parallels the dawning realization of the automobile’s unsustainable cultural role at the beginning of the 21st century. After the exhibition, the car will be abandoned yet again, this time at a scrap yard where it will be dismantled for re-use. Proyecto Coche is part of a series of projects that focuses on material culture as a reflection of consumer society.

Baghdad In No Particular Order, Paul Chan, photograph 2003

Baghdad in No Particular Order consists of footage that Paul Chan shot when visiting Baghdad in 2002 as a member of Voices in the Wilderness, a group formed to nonviolently challenge the economic warfare being waged by the US against the people of Iraq. The video essay of life in Baghdad shows Iraqis engaged in everyday activities. The images are almost shockingly banal. They shows Iraqis in their homes, at work, among friends, in places of worship. It’s the daily, unthreatening life newspaper don’t show us. Six year after the beginning of the war, Chan’s film amplifies awareness of the damage inflicted on human lives. The people that appear in the movie have survived the first Gulf War. They’ve been dragged into another war, into oppression and occupation. Are they still alive today?

Another theme explored by the exhibition is the countermeasures of surveillance and repression that the state as well as global capital set up in an to attempt to maintain control and clean up or minimize the wreckage.

Trevor Paglan’s Limit Telephotography photo series uses high powered telescopes to picture US government “black” sites and spy satellites. Paradoxically his images deepen the secrecy of their subject rather than uncover it. Limit-telephotography most closely resembles astrophotography, a technique that astronomers use to photograph objects that might be trillions of miles from Earth. Paglen’s subjects are much closer but also even more difficult to photograph. To physical distance, one has indeed to add the obstacle of informational obfuscation.

Part 2: Globalization and agency

The future seen from here is gloomy. It is made of ecological disasters, political tensions, economical apartheid, overpopulation and promises never fulfilled. Feedforward, the exhibition opened a couple of weeks ago at the Laboral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial in Gijón, offers space for artist to reflect and comment on the global political and social forces that drive us forward.

Image courtesy Laboral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial

In a previous post, Feedforward. The Angel of History. Part 1, i focused on two chapters of the exhibition dedicated to wreckage and countermeasures. I’m now going to skip the section on the Aesthetic and Symbolic Language and concentrate on the ones that address globalization and agency.

The artworks that engage with the forces of economic globalization highlight how globe-spanning modes of industry –such as outsourcing and migration– uses digital technologies to intertwine even more intimately political, economic and cultural factors.

Goldin+Senneby, Looking for Headless, 2007-, ongoing project

Headless (2007 -) is one of the most exciting projects i’ve seen at Feedforward. Part of my enthusiasm is due to Dr Angus Cameron’s lecture during the symposium that accompanied the opening of the exhibition. Cameron presented himself as a Human Geographer at University of Leicester, acting as the emissary of artist collaboration GOLDIN + SENNEBY. He almost immediately added that this definition of himself might not even be true, ‘maybe i’m just an actor pretending to be a Human Geographer.’ The tone of the project was set.

Headless looks into offshore finance, and its production of virtual space through legal code.Through actions and theoretical pursuits, the artists interrogate the mythologies created by virtual economies and fictional personae. The project began in 2007 with the investigation of the offshore company Headless Ltd located in the Bahamas.

Goldin+Senneby have commissioned author John Barlow, using the pseudonym K.D., to be both an employee at an offshore consultancy company and the ghostwriter of a murder mystery where both real and fictional characters are allowed to appear in the story and in reality. Barlow went to the Bahamas to visit the offshore company Headless. He never managed to visit it. You can send money to an offshore company but because it should not have any physical presence, you cannot visit it.

April 4th – View from the terrace, my last lunch in the Bahamas. Photo: John Barlow

One of Goldin+Senneby’s hypothesis is that Headless Ltd is a contemporary incarnation of ‘Acéphale,’ the secret society initiated by philosopher Georges Bataille in the 1930s ((Acéphale does indeed come from the Greek a-cephalus, literally “headless”).

Headless is not a simulation. Several people are involved in the project and because each of them knows only a part of it, they play a role in an ongoing performance that is almost a pastiche of offshore practices. The project, however, uses human capital, not financial capital (no one gets paid.)

Mixing human drama and poetic narrative, Cao Fei’s Whose Utopia? proposes a vision of a reality where even the most mind-numbing mechanized production system cannot crush human dreams and aspirations. The bitter-sweet video was shot at OSRAM China Lighting Ltd. factory in the Pearl River Delta, which has led the massive boom in China’s economy and has drawn workers from throughout China in search of a better life. Cao Fei’s video show the workers endlessly repeating the same gestures: they insert tiny filaments into delicate light bulbs, they test then pack them into boxes.

In the following chapter of Whose Utopia?, heavy machines and monotonous gestures give way to a “Factory Fairytale.” Workers become dancers and musicians gliding and playing while their colleagues haven’t left their seat in the chain. But that was just a dream. Reality kicks in by the end of the video.

Cao Fei, Whose Utopia? 2006

The last section of the exhibition explores possibilities of reconstruction and agency. Do we still have hope and space for collectivity and responsible action? Is it possible to clean up after the 20th century? What is democracy now? What does progress mean when older concepts, such as continuous economic growth, seem to have failed?

Daniel G. Andújar’s Postcapital Archive is an installation that gives access to over 250,000 text, video, and audio documents that the artist has compiled from the Internet. The archive spans the years that separate the fall of the Berlin Wall from the attacks on September 11.

Daniel García Andújar, from: Postcapital Archive (1989-2001), Gaza-Berlin

Although the collection of documents opens with the fall of the Berlin Wall, Andújar takes the perspective not of post-Communism, but of post-capitalism. How much have capitalist societies really adjusted and evolved in absence of their erstwhile counterparts? Deep changes have indeed affected the social, political, economic and cultural all over the world over the past two decades. However, new walls are being erected all over the world, both physically and metaphorically, by capitalist societies. What matter in Andujar’s installation is not so much the compilation of the videos and texts but what visitors make of them, the way they explore, learn, draw their own conclusions and interact with this mass of information.

Feedforward. The Angel of History is a dense exhibition. I made three tours of it, read the press material, browsed through the catalog, attended the first day of the symposium and still feel the desire to see the show again. Feedforward is one of those rare shows that brings me back into the arms of media art when i least expect it.

Feedforward is also very North American in the selection of the issues highlighted and the way they are covered. This is absolutely not a bad thing when the exhibition is so intelligent but the Euro-centric blogger that i am couldn’t stop wondering how European curators would have handled the same exhibition.

Just a last hurray for the elegant work done by Office for Strategic Spaces. The architects were in charge with the spatial design of the exhibition. Instead of separating the artworks into isolated thematic groups, the dividing walls that OSS designed are light and transparent enough to let the works coexist in a single landscape.

All my images from the exhibition.
FEEDFORWARD – The Angel of History is on view until April 5, 2010 at Laboral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial in Gijón, Spain.

Previous posts about this exhibition: Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad 1798-2006 and Smoke and Hot Air.

Share:

Tags: 2009, Christiane Paul, Gijón, Laboral, Postcapital, Steve Dietz, we-make-money-not-art

El artista como profeta

admin — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:27:44 +0000

Feedforward. El ángel de la historia.

COM.: S. Dietz y C. Paul. Laboral centro de arte. Los Prados, 121. Gijón. Hasta el 5 de abril de 2010.

elcultural.es Víctor del Río

Feedforward. El ángel de la historia, es una exposición que continúa un camino que LABoral Centro de Arte mantiene desde su apertura, en la frontera entre el arte y la creación industrial. De hecho, con esta propuesta se cierra un círculo en la programación al establecer un diálogo con Feedback, inaugurada el 30 de marzo de 2007, y que fue el comienzo de la andadura del centro. Un recorrido que toma un nuevo rumbo ahora con la incorporación de Benjamin Weil como comisario jefe, tras la marcha de Eric Berger.

Esta muestra, comisariada por Christine Paul y Steve Dietz, concita una selección de obras que trabaja con los espacios de interacción social derivados de las nuevas tecnologías. El planteamiento teórico evoca el conocido comentario de Walter Benjamin sobre el cuadro de Paul Klee, Angelus novus. A propósito de esta obra, Benjamin habla de una conciencia de la historia y del progreso como un vórtice de ruinas y catástrofe, y el motivo se recicla ahora para la comunicación de masas y las nuevas redes sociales.

En la exposición, esta sugerencia temática se desglosa en casi treinta obras. Aunque son variados los temas que se abordan en cada uno de los trabajos, y diversos sus resultados, pueden reconocerse sensibilidades comunes que la muestra trata de recoger. Despliegues como la proyección de Christopher Baker, Hello World! (2006), con miles de relatos autobiográficos vertidos a la cámara y disponibles en Youtube, forman un nuevo fresco sociológico. Otras obras, como la de Carey Young, Product Recall (2007), reubican los eslóganes publicitarios de las grandes marcas comerciales en el contexto de una sesión de psicoanálisis con un perturbador efecto discursivo. Por su parte, Piotr Szyhalski, en White Star Cluster (2009), propone una reescenificación sonora a partir de los registros de una operación militar en Iraq. Piezas más conocidas completan este panorama. Es el caso de Last Riot (2005-2007) de AES+F, con un fresco de imaginería adolescente en un combate teatralizado que recuerda a la antigua tradición pictórica, o el archivo Postcapital (2008) de Daniel García Andujar, que acumula todo tipo de documentos culturales disponibles en la red facilitando un nuevo sistema de búsquedas que se modifica y amplía con cada asociación que establece el usuario. El excelente montaje de la muestra, ya una marca de la casa en LABoral, esta vez a cargo de ángel Borrego, aglutina un discurso expositivo bien trabado.

El concepto de feedforward (prealimentación) procede de algunos ámbitos científicos y técnicos. En esos contextos el término feedforward se utiliza para describir dispositivos capaces de anticiparse a los cambios que pueden afectar a un sistema dado. La exposición trata de pulsar aspectos fundamentales sobre la función social del artista en nuestro tiempo y le sitúa en el lugar de quien se anticipa a los cambios culturales. Esta versión del artista como profeta, por cierto, se remonta a los orígenes de la teoría de los medios y se encuentra en el mismo McLuhan, aunque los comisarios prefieren invocar a autores más recientes. Parece claro que no es posible pensar el arte contemporáneo fuera del escenario creado por la comunicación de masas. La exposición, en este aspecto, resulta una excelente ilustración de este vínculo ya irrevocable.

Share:

Tags: 2009, Christiane Paul, Gijón, Laboral, Postcapital, Steve Dietz, Víctor del Río

iD BARRIO | Barcelona

admin — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:38:21 +0000

CREATIVIDAD SOCIAL, ACCIÓN COLECTIVA Y PRÁCTICAS ARTÍSTICAS

iD BARRIO ES UN PROYECTO VINCULADO A iD#5 QUE EXPLORA LA IDEA DE BARRIO DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA URBANA Y A TRAVÉS DE LA RELACIÓN ENTRE ARTE, CREATIVIDAD SOCIAL Y
TRANSFORMACIÓN DEL ENTORNO. CONSTA DE TRES PARTES INTERRELACIONADAS: SEMINARIO, TALLER Y EXPOSICIÓN (DISPOSITIVO ITINERANTE).
EL PROYECTO SE DESARROLLARÁ EN CALAF Y BARCELONA, PERMITIENDO TRABAJAR EL TEMA DEL BARRIO DESDE EL CONTEXTO DE CIUDADES PEQUEÑAS Y MEDIANAS EN ÁREAS RURALES Y EN RELACIÓN CON LA METRÓPOLIS.

Lugar: La Capella. C.Hospital, 56. 08001 Barcelona. Tel: 93 442 71 71
Seminario: 27-28 noviembre 2009
Taller: del 30 noviembre al 4 diciembre 2009
Exposición Dispositivo Itinerante: del 27 noviembre al 8 diciembre 2009

Viernes 27 de noviembre
11.00h
El contexto local y la dinámica global en el espacio institucional cultural.
- Hans D.Christ, Iris Dressler. Directores del WKV Württembergischer Kunstverein Stuttgart. Han comisariado numerosos proyectos, entre ellos, On Difference. Políticas del espacio acerca de la expropiación y re-apropiación de los espacios de acción social, política y cultural.
- Daniel G. Andújar. Fundador de Technologies To The People y director de numerosos proyectos en internet como art.net.dortmund, e-barcelona.org o e-valencia.org. Su trabajo cuestiona las promesas democráticas e igualitarias de las nuevas tecnologías de la comunicación.
- Judi Werthein. Artista. Su trabajo ha sido mostrado en el Tate Modern, el Centrum Beeldende Kunst en Rótterdam, Stichting de Appel en Ámsterdam, Museo del Barrio (Nueva York) entre otros, y ha participado en eventos internacionales como InSite_05 (Tijuana) y Manifesta7.
17.00h
Arquitectura activa y cartografía viva. Espacios para el intercambio de experiencias.
- Basurama. Colectivo dedicado a la investigación y gestión cultural que ha centrado su área de estudio y actuación en los procesos productivos, la generación de desechos que estos implican y las posibilidades creativas que suscita esta coyuntura contemporánea.
- Santiago Cirugeda. Arquitecto. Desarrolla proyectos de subversión en distintos ámbitos de la realidad urbana. Actualmente involucrado en proyectos de autoconstrucción en varias ciudades españolas, donde grupos de ciudadanos deciden generar sus propios espacios urbanos.
- Martín di Peco. Arquitecto por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Forma parte de diversos colectivos de experimentación e investigación sobre sociedad – arte – territorio.
- Sin|studio. Grupo de creadores emergentes dedicado a la investigación del ámbito de confluencia entre la arquitectura, el arte y otros campos de conocimiento. Desarrollan proyectos de intervención en espacios públicos, con objeto de trabajar sobre las condiciones de contextos sociales concretos.
- Traces of Autism. Colectivo interdisciplinario que trabaja sobre el análisis y cartografía del territorio realizando largos recorridos por el espacio público para producir un archivo de elementos encontrados, traduciéndolo en mapas, textos, imágenes y videos.
- Martí Peran. Comisario independiente y profesor de teoría del arte en la Universitat de Barcelona. Recientemente ha impulsado el proyecto Ciutats Ocasionals y comisariado Arquitectures sense lloc. Es miembro editor de “Roulotte” y colabora con varias revistas de arte (Exit Express, Artforum International).
20.00h
Inauguración de la exposición Dispositivo Itinerante.
Sábado 28 de noviembre
11.00h
Mediación creativa y barrio en los procesos de intervención artística.
- Francesca Comisso. Comisaria y miembro del colectivo a.titolo, dedicado a las prácticas artísticas que tratan sobre las dimensiones sociales y políticas del espacio público. Es profesora en el Politécnico de Turín.
- Paola di Bello. Artista. Profesora de fotografía en el Brera Academy of Arts, Milano. Su trabajo explora problemas socio-políticos que definen la ciudad contemporánea.
- iviana Bravo. Artista visual especializada en Integración entre Arte y Arquitectura. Realiza proyectos colaborativos e intervenciones vinculadas a espacios públicos en conflicto. Es profesora de la Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Chile y en la Escuela de Artes de la Universidad del Desarrollo.
- KUNSTrePUBLIK. Colectivo de artistas que produce proyectos y genera estrategias in situ para espacios públicos no usados y mutables.
17.00h
El barrio, participación y gestión de la diferencia.
- Gary W. McDonogh. Antropólogo. Director y profesor del Program in Growth and Structure of Cities. Bryn Mawr Collage, Philadelphia.
- Fadhila Mammar. Licenciada en Filología Española por la Universidad de Grenoble (Francia) y Túnez. Master en
Migraciones, Refugio y Relaciones Intercomunitarias. Es mediadora, y experta en Mediación Intercultural.
- José Luis Oyon. Arquitecto profesor de la Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Entre sus libros cabe destacar: Atlas histórico de ciudades europeas; Barcelona, 1930: un atlas social; El cinturón rojinegro y La quiebra de la ciudad popular.
- Montserrat Santolino. Periodista. Representante de la Associació Cultural Florida-Waslala, que ha participado en el Plan de Desarrollo Comunitario del barrio y en el proceso de definición del Plan Integral, ampliado gracias a la Ley de barrios.
- Sergi Alegre Calero. Teniente de alcalde de Urbanismo, Territorio y Medio Ambiente y concejal del Plan de Actuación de Sant Cosme, Ayuntamiento del Prat de Llobregat.
- Loïc Wacquant. Sociólogo. Autor de los Condenados de la ciudad. Ha analizado los suburbios de Paris y diferentes
ciudades americanas. Profesor de sociología en la Universidad de Berkeley, California. [Participa en el seminario con un texto que se distribuirá entre los asistentes].
20.30h
Programación de vídeos comentados sobre temáticas de acción colectiva en el contexto de barrio.
A cargo de Manuel Delgado, antropólogo y profesor de la Universitat de Barcelona.

Viernes 4 de diciembre
18.00h
Presentación de proyectos del taller KUNSTrePUBLIK.
20.30h
Presentación del proyecto Històries i Llocs de Sans Façon, promovido en colaboración entre Idensitat y Priorat
Centre d’Art con la participación de DO Montsant y la colaboración del celler El Masroig y el celler Aibar. Habrá cata de vinos de la DO Montsant.
Taller KUNSTrePUBLIK: 30 noviembre – 4 diciembre 2009
El taller estará dirigido por el colectivo KUNSTrePUBLIK [Markus Lohmann, Harry Sachs, Philip Horst, Daniel Seiple, Matthias Einhoff]. En el taller se harán propuestas de trabajo específicas que estarán orientadas a poner en relación la exploración del territorio, el análisis del espacio con el activismo sociocultural y la participación. El taller será de carácter transdisciplinar, combinando personas que trabajan en contextos de barrio con artistas, arquitectos y diseñadores. Autores del trabajo Skulpturenpark Berlin_Zentrum, http://www.skulpturenpark.org/
Taller Traces of Autism: 30 noviembre – 4 diciembre 2009
El taller estará dirigido por el colectivo Traces of Autism [Jozua Zaagman, Maartje Dros, Jacqueline Schoemaker]. Colectivo interdisciplinario que trabaja sobre el análisis y cartografía del territorio realizando largos recorridos por el espacio público para producir un archivo de elementos encontrados, traduciéndolo en mapas, textos, imágenes y videos. El taller consistirá en aplicar esta metodología de trabajo en un barrio de Barcelona.
Dirección de los seminarios: Gaspar Maza, antropólogo, profesor de la Universitat Rovira i Virgili de Tarragona y Ramon Parramon, director de Idensitat y profesor de Elisava.
iD Barrio | Barcelona, es una propuesta de IDENSITAT para La Capella. Ajuntament de Barcelona en colaboración con el Goethe Institut, el
Consulado General de los Países Bajos en Barcelona y Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura.
Más información e inscripciones: idensitat@idensitat.net | www.idensitat.net

Share:

Tags: 2009, Barcelona, e-idensitat.org, Idensitat, Idensitat07, La Capella

Daniel García Andújar Archive » 2009

Daniel G. Andújar, Lapses

Related posts

Ways of Working. Iris Dressler vs Daniel G. Andújar

Related posts

On és la bretxa? Debat obert sobre el funcionament de la cadena de valor en les Arts Visuals

Related posts

Territoris de Fricció

Related posts

El pabellón catalán en la Bienal de Venecia recibió 45.633 visitas

Related posts

iD Barrio. Seminario internacional + taller de proyectos |Barcelona

Related posts

Tecnología transparente

- José Manuel Costa

Related posts

Feedforward. The Angel of History.

By Regine www.we-make-money-not-art.com

Part 1: Wreckage and countermeasures

Part 2: Globalization and agency

Related posts

El artista como profeta

Feedforward. El ángel de la historia.

COM.: S. Dietz y C. Paul. Laboral centro de arte. Los Prados, 121. Gijón. Hasta el 5 de abril de 2010.

Related posts

iD BARRIO | Barcelona

Related posts